Earlier this week, a Federal Judge in Washington D.C. upheld a USCIS decision denying an H-1b transfer petition for a QA Analyst under the theory that the position was not a specialty occupation. This decision is a major win for the Trump administration as the Court deferred to the Agency’s interpretation of the definition of a specialty occupation. The Court did not address the single degree issue. There are a number of facts that are relevant when viewing this decision. The petition was filed under the 15-1199.00 SOC classification as a Quality Assurance Engineer/Tester, a category that lacks DOL support for a specialty occupation finding. Further, the petitioner in its petition declared that many different educational fields would be suitable for such a position and named such disparate fields as sciences, engineering, and mathematics. The petition even stated that the position would accept a “wide range of specialties” ! Its as if this petition was drafted with an eye toward a denial or a failure to recognize the standards for an H-1b that have been the norm for the past 2+ years. Its unfortunate that this case was brought in front of a Federal Judge with these facts. As the old adage goes, bad facts, make bad law.
H-1b Denial Upheld in Federal Court
By Mike Hammond|2019-07-18T01:06:20+00:00July 18th, 2019|Categories: Visas - H-1b, L-1, E, O, TN|Tags: H-1b denial, Sagarwala, specialty ocucpation|0 Comments
Premium ReturnsMay 29th, 2020 | 0 Comments
H-1b Victory with a Capital V !May 21st, 2020 | 0 Comments
Will the Facts Matter ?May 20th, 2020 | 0 Comments